Skip to content
Rambam In-Depth February 20, 2026 3 min

Rambam In-Depth: Why Did He Write BOTH Beis HaMikdash AND Mizbeach?

🕌 DEEP HALACHIC ANALYSIS: Every Word in Rambam Is Meduyak 🕌

Welcome to a genuine deep dive into Rambam’s precise language in Hilchos Teshuvah, Perek Aleph, Halacha Gimmel. This shiur explores a fundamental question: Why does the Rambam write BOTH “בזמן הזה שאין בית המקדש קיים” (nowadays there’s no Beis HaMikdash) AND “ואין לנו מזבח כפרה” (we don’t have a Mizbeach for atonement)? Couldn’t he have said just one?

The Rambam’s Language: בזמן הזה שאין בית המקדש קיים ואין לנו מזבח כפרה אין שם אלא תשובה

“Nowadays when the Beis HaMikdash is not standing and we don’t have a Mizbeach for atonement, we can’t bring korbanos - korban chatas, korban asham - so there’s only teshuvah.”

🎯 What You’ll Learn in This Shiur:

The Core Question: Why mention both the absence of the Beis HaMikdash AND the Mizbeach? Isn’t one redundant? This seemingly simple question opens up a world of halachic analysis that connects multiple areas of the Rambam’s shitos.

The Rambam Goes L’Shitaso: We explore how the Rambam in Hilchos Beis HaBechirah (Perek Beis and Perek Vav) poskens: מקריבין בזמן הזה אף על פי שאין בית - “We can bring korbanos today even though there’s no Beis!”

The Revolutionary Concept: The kedusha rishona that Shlomo HaMelech established was l’shato u’l’asid lavo - not just for his time, but for the future as well. This means the kedusha of the Mokom HaMikdash remains even without the physical Beis HaMikdash!

The Critical Distinction:

  • Without Beis HaMikdash: According to Rambam, you CAN still bring korbanos (in theory)
  • Without Mizbeach: You CANNOT bring korbanos
  • This explains why both need to be mentioned!

Enter the Tosfos: We analyze Tosfos in Zvachim (דף נט עמוד ב) who writes that a mincha does not need a Mizbeach. But the Rambam clearly doesn’t hold like this - why not? What about a minchas chatas?

The Zeivach Kodashim’s Chiddush: The Sefer Zeivach Kodashim (pirush on Zvachim) offers a revolutionary approach: Even though you don’t need a Mizbeach for mincha, you still need the Beis HaMikdash itself! This would explain both aspects of the Rambam’s language.

⏱️ Detailed Timestamps:

💡 Key Halachic Concepts Explored:

  1. Diyuk B’Lashon HaRambam - Precision in Rambam’s language
  2. Kedusha Rishona L’Shato U’L’Asid Lavo - Permanence of original sanctification
  3. Mokom HaMikdash vs. Beis HaMikdash - The place vs. the structure
  4. Mizbeach Requirements - When and why it’s necessary
  5. L’Shitaso - Internal consistency across Rambam’s works
  6. Machlokes Rishonim - How different authorities understand korban requirements

📚 Sources Referenced:

Primary Sources:

  • Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah Perek 1, Halacha 3
  • Rambam Hilchos Beis HaBechirah Perek 2 and Perek 6
  • Tosfos Zvachim דף נט עמוד ב
  • Sefer Zeivach Kodashim (Commentary on Zvachim)

🤔 Questions for Deeper Reflection:

  1. Why would the Rambam need to mention something that seems obvious (no Beis HaMikdash)?
  2. What’s the practical difference between the kedusha of the place vs. the structure?
  3. How does understanding this Rambam affect our approach to teshuvah today?
  4. Why would mincha be different from other korbanos regarding the Mizbeach?
  5. Is the Zeivach Kodashim’s chiddush mashma from the Rambam’s language?
  6. What does “l’shitaso” teach us about learning Rambam systematically?

📖 Learning Resources:

For This Sugya:

  • Rav Chaim Soloveitchik on Hilchos Beis HaBechirah
  • Maharatz Chajes on kedushas Eretz Yisrael
  • Shaarei Yosher on kedusha rishona
  • Modern teshuvos about Har HaBayis

General Rambam Learning:

  • Frankel Edition of Mishneh Torah (with extensive academic notes)
  • Yad Peshuta (comprehensive commentary)
  • Kessef Mishnah (classic commentary)
  • Lechem Mishneh (in-depth analysis)

In this class

  1. 0:00The Two-Word Question
  2. 0:45Rambam in Beis HaBechirah
  3. 1:30Kedusha Rishona L'Asid Lavo
  4. 2:15Tosfos & Zeivach Kodashim
  5. 3:00The Remaining Kushya

Part of the series Rambam In-Depth